M 7.6 - 99 km SE of Sand Point, Alaska
- 2020-10-19 20:54:38 (UTC)
- 54.602°N 159.626°W
- 28.4 km depth
Finite Fault
- The data below are the most preferred data available
- The data below have been reviewed by a scientist
Scientific Analysis
We have chosen to model slip on the moderately dipping right-lateral strike-slip fault striking toward the NNW because this nodal plane fits the data better and is consistent with the early aftershock distribution. We note that the depth to the top of the slab at the location of the epicenter is about 26 km, yet our model strongly prefers slip at shallower depths. Rupture extending through the top of the slab is non-physical and is likely indicative of some greater rupture complexity (e.g. multi-fault rupture) not considered in this model.
Data Process and Inversion
We analyzed 83 teleseismic broadband P waveforms, 18 broadband SH waveforms, and 106 long period surface waves selected based on data quality and azimuthal distribution. Waveforms are first converted to displacement by removing the instrument response and are then used to constrain the slip history using a finite fault inverse algorithm (Ji et al., 2002). We begin modeling using a hypocenter matching or adjusted slightly from the initial NEIC solution ( location = 54.7°N, 159.7°W; depth = 40.1 km ), and a fault plane defined using either the rapid W-Phase moment tensor (for near-real time solutions), or the gCMT moment tensor (for historic solutions).
Result
This result is based on the moment tensor nodal plane ( strike = 346.0°; dip = 56.0° ). The seismic moment release based upon this plane is 2.9e+20 N-m (Mw = 7.6) using a 1D crustal model interpolated from CRUST2.0 (Bassin et al., 2000).
Cross-section of Slip Distribution

Surface Projection

Moment Rate Function
