M 6.5 - Stanley, Idaho
- 2020-03-31 23:52:30 (UTC)
- 44.465°N 115.118°W
- 12.1 km depth
Finite Fault
- The data below are the most preferred data available
- The data below have been reviewed by a scientist
Scientific Analysis
This event is on the small side for typical teleseismic FFMs, but STF has ~8s duration and waveform fits are very good, so model seems reasonably well resolved given limitations. Here we use velocity data (typically better for resolution for this sized EQ), and assume rupture on the ~N-S striking fault, aligning with regional geology. Max slip ~1m, and slip does not reach the surface in this model.
Data Process and Inversion
We analyzed 26 teleseismic broadband P waveforms, 3 broadband SH waveforms, and 34 long period surface waves selected based on data quality and azimuthal distribution. Waveforms are first converted to displacement by removing the instrument response and are then used to constrain the slip history using a finite fault inverse algorithm (Ji et al., 2002). We begin modeling using a hypocenter matching or adjusted slightly from the initial NEIC solution ( location = 44.4°N, 115.1°W; depth = 10.0 km ), and a fault plane defined using either the rapid W-Phase moment tensor (for near-real time solutions), or the gCMT moment tensor (for historic solutions).
Result
This result is based on the moment tensor nodal plane ( strike = 172.0°; dip = 74.0° ). The seismic moment release based upon this plane is 6.5e+18 N-m (Mw = 6.5) using a 1D crustal model interpolated from CRUST2.0 (Bassin et al., 2000).
Cross-section of Slip Distribution

Surface Projection

Moment Rate Function
