Seismic Network Operations

US ECSD

EROS Data Center, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA

US ECSD commences operations on: 2006,137

Country Flag
Host:
Latitude: 43.734
Longitude: -96.614
Elevation: 478
Datalogger: Q330
Broadband: CMG3TB
Accelerometer: EST-S
Telemetry Status at the NEIC: Last Data In Less Than 10 Minutes
Station Photo Station Photo Station Photo 
Location CodeChannel CodeInstrumentFlagsSample RateDipAzimuthDepth
00VH1CMG3TBCG0.100.0027.5045.10
10VH1KS54000CG0.100.00174.50127.40
00VH2CMG3TBCG0.100.00117.5045.10
10VH2KS54000CG0.100.00264.50127.40
00VHZCMG3TBCG0.10-90.000.0045.10
10VHZKS54000CG0.10-90.000.00127.40
00LHZCMG3TBCG1.00-90.000.0045.10
00LH2CMG3TBCG1.000.00117.5045.10
10LH2KS54000CG1.000.00264.50127.40
00LH1CMG3TBCG1.000.0027.5045.10
10LH1KS54000CG1.000.00174.50127.40
30LDOMICROBAROGRAPHCG1.000.000.000.00
10LHZKS54000CG1.00-90.000.00127.40
20LN1EST-S2GCG1.000.000.000.00
20LN2EST-S2GCG1.000.0090.000.00
20LNZEST-S2GCG1.00-90.000.000.00
20HNZEST-S2GTG200.00-90.000.000.00
20HN2EST-S2GTG200.000.0090.000.00
20HN1EST-S2GTG200.000.000.000.00
00BH1CMG3TBCG40.000.0027.5045.10
10BH1KS54000CG40.000.00174.50127.40
00BH2CMG3TBCG40.000.00117.5045.10
10BH2KS54000CG40.000.00264.50127.40
00BHZCMG3TBCG40.00-90.000.0045.10
10BHZKS54000CG40.00-90.000.00127.40
PDF, All
Image Unavailable

PDF, Last Month
Image Unavailable

PDF, Month
Image Unavailable

PDF, Current Week
Image Unavailable

PDF, Year
Image Unavailable

Heliplot
Image Unavailable
Latency
Image Unavailable

Availability, Year
Image Unavailable

Availability, Since 1972
Image Unavailable

Availability, 2 Month
Image Unavailable

As part of the annual calibration process, the USGS runs a sequence that includes a random, a step, and several sine wave calibrations.  The USGS analyzes the random binary calibration signal in order to estimate the instrument response.  The figures below show the results from the analysis of the most recent processed calibration at the station.

We use an iterative three-step method to estimate instrument response parameters (poles, zeros, sensitivity and gain) and their associated errors using random calibration signals. First, we solve a coarse non-linear inverse problem using a least squares grid search to yield a first approximation to the solution. This approach reduces the likelihood of poorly estimated parameters (a local-minimum solution) caused by noise in the calibration records and enhances algorithm convergence. Second, we iteratively solve a non-linear parameter estimation problem to obtain the least squares best-fit Laplace pole/zero/gain model. Third, by applying the central limit theorem we estimate the errors in this pole/zero model by solving the inverse problem at each frequency in a 2/3rds-octave band centered at each best-fit pole/zero frequency. This procedure yields error estimates of the 99% confidence interval.

LocChanCal DateEpoch-SpanGradeAmp Nominal Error (dB)Amp Best Fit Error (dB)Phase Nominal Error (degree)Phase Best Fit Error (degree)SensorCal Type
00BH22013:2122011:122 to No Ending TimeA0.0893030.0232640.570230.45687CMG3Random
00BH12013:2122011:122 to No Ending TimeA0.0903640.0226760.53160.43279CMG3Random
00BHZ2013:2122011:122 to No Ending TimeA0.012550.0100310.0662530.074735CMG3Random
  1. 2012-05-18
    Noisy Episensor was replaced.
  2. 2006-05-17
    Installed.