Seismic Network Operations
IU DWPF
Disney Wilderness Preserve, Florida, USA
IU DWPF commences operations on: 1998,214
| Host: | The Nature Conservancy |
|---|---|
| Latitude: | 28.11 |
| Longitude: | -81.433 |
| Elevation: | 30 |
| Datalogger: | Q330 |
| Broadband: | KS-54000 |
| Accelerometer: | FBA_ES-T_EpiSensor_Accelerometer |
| Telemetry Status at the NEIC: |
|
Vault Condition: Borehole depth is -162m.
Site Geology: Quaternary aged undifferentiated sands, clayey sands, marls, and peats. The layers are no more than 20 feet thick.
| Location Code | Channel Code | Instrument | Flags | Sample Rate | Dip | Azimuth | Depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | BH1 | Trillium 240 broad band | CG | 40.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 00 | BH1 | KS-54000 | CG | 20.00 | 0.00 | 311.00 | 162.00 |
| 10 | BH2 | Trillium 240 broad band | CG | 40.00 | 0.00 | 90.00 | 0.00 |
| 00 | BH2 | KS-54000 | CG | 20.00 | 0.00 | 41.00 | 162.00 |
| 10 | BHZ | Trillium 240 broad band | CG | 40.00 | -90.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 00 | BHZ | KS-54000 | CG | 20.00 | -90.00 | 0.00 | 162.00 |
| 10 | HH1 | Trillium 240 broad band | TG | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 10 | HH2 | Trillium 240 broad band | TG | 100.00 | 0.00 | 90.00 | 0.00 |
| 10 | HHZ | Trillium 240 broad band | TG | 100.00 | -90.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 20 | HN1 | FBA ES-T EpiSensor Accelerometer | TG | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 20 | HN2 | FBA ES-T EpiSensor Accelerometer | TG | 100.00 | 0.00 | 90.00 | 0.00 |
| 20 | HNZ | FBA ES-T EpiSensor Accelerometer | TG | 100.00 | -90.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 30 | LDO | CI/PAS pressure sensor | CW | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 10 | LH1 | Trillium 240 broad band | CG | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 00 | LH1 | KS-54000 | CG | 1.00 | 0.00 | 311.00 | 162.00 |
| 10 | LH2 | Trillium 240 broad band | CG | 1.00 | 0.00 | 90.00 | 0.00 |
| 00 | LH2 | KS-54000 | CG | 1.00 | 0.00 | 41.00 | 162.00 |
| 10 | LHZ | Trillium 240 broad band | CG | 1.00 | -90.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 00 | LHZ | KS-54000 | CG | 1.00 | -90.00 | 0.00 | 162.00 |
| 20 | LN1 | FBA ES-T EpiSensor Accelerometer | CG | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 20 | LN2 | FBA ES-T EpiSensor Accelerometer | CG | 1.00 | 0.00 | 90.00 | 0.00 |
| 20 | LNZ | FBA ES-T EpiSensor Accelerometer | CG | 1.00 | -90.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 10 | VH1 | Trillium 240 broad band | CG | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 00 | VH1 | KS-54000 | CG | 0.10 | 0.00 | 311.00 | 162.00 |
| 10 | VH2 | Trillium 240 broad band | CG | 0.10 | 0.00 | 90.00 | 0.00 |
| 00 | VH2 | KS-54000 | CG | 0.10 | 0.00 | 41.00 | 162.00 |
| 10 | VHZ | Trillium 240 broad band | CG | 0.10 | -90.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 00 | VHZ | KS-54000 | CG | 0.10 | -90.00 | 0.00 | 162.00 |

PDF, Last Month

PDF, Last Year

PDF, Month

PDF, Current Week

PDF, Year

PDF, All

PDF, Last Month

PDF, Last Year

PDF, Month

PDF, Current Week

PDF, Year




Availability, Since 1972

Availability, 2 Month

As part of the annual calibration process, the USGS runs a sequence that includes a random, a step, and several sine wave calibrations. The USGS analyzes the random binary calibration signal in order to estimate the instrument response. The figures below show the results from the analysis of the most recent processed calibration at the station.
We use an iterative three-step method to estimate instrument response parameters (poles, zeros, sensitivity and gain) and their associated errors using random calibration signals. First, we solve a coarse non-linear inverse problem using a least squares grid search to yield a first approximation to the solution. This approach reduces the likelihood of poorly estimated parameters (a local-minimum solution) caused by noise in the calibration records and enhances algorithm convergence. Second, we iteratively solve a non-linear parameter estimation problem to obtain the least squares best-fit Laplace pole/zero/gain model. Third, by applying the central limit theorem we estimate the errors in this pole/zero model by solving the inverse problem at each frequency in a 2/3rds-octave band centered at each best-fit pole/zero frequency. This procedure yields error estimates of the 99% confidence interval.
| Loc | Chan | Cal Date | Epoch-Span | Grade | Amp Nominal Error (dB) | Amp Best Fit Error (dB) | Phase Nominal Error (degree) | Phase Best Fit Error (degree) | Sensor | Cal Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 00 | BHZ | 2011:093 | 2011:092 to No Ending T | A | 0.0065712 | 0.0058519 | 0.061051 | 0.069775 | 54000 | Random |
| 00 | BH2 | 2011:093 | 2011:092 to No Ending T | A | 0.010375 | 0.0064611 | 0.057509 | 0.082486 | 54000 | Random |
| 00 | BH1 | 2011:093 | 2011:092 to No Ending T | A | 0.0082097 | 0.0055267 | 0.064378 | 0.053075 | 54000 | Random |
| 10 | BHZ | 2010:313 | 2010:267 to No Ending T | A | 0.013566 | 0.0070976 | 0.10639 | 0.079902 | TR-240 | Random |
-
Current IssuesPower system may be causing some station noise.
-
2012-06-23Episensor replace due to noise issues.
-
2010-10-09Upgraded to Q330 digitizer.

