Comments |
The assigned characteristic rate is based on the average recurrence intervals documented by Ramelli and others (2002, 2004). Ramelli and others (2004) changed the name of this fault to Peavine Peak fault, as reflected here. Dip of fault changed to 50? based on redefined regional default value (Lund, 2006). |
Selected References |
Lund, W.R., ed., 2006, Basin and Range Province Earthquake Working Group seismic-hazard recommendations to the U.S. Geological Survey National Seismic Hazard Mapping Program: Utah Geological Survey Open-File Report 477, 23 p, ugspub.nr.utah.gov/publications/open_file_reports/OFR-477.pdf. Ramelli, A.R., dePolo, C.M., and Bell, J.W., 2003, Paleoseismic studies of the Peavine Peak fault: Technical report to U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, under Contract 01HQGR0167, 14 p. Ramelli, A.R., Bell, J.W., and dePolo, C.M., 2004, Peavine Peak fault: Another piece of the Walker Lane puzzle, in Proceedings volume for the Basin and Range Province Seismic Hazards Summit II: Western States Seismic Policy Council, Program with Abstracts, p. 126-128.
|